FANDOM

Jaxterhammer

aka Jaxter

  • I live in America
  • My occupation is Independent Work
  • I am Lmfao good question

Welcome to Xenopedia!

Mike Harrigan

"Welcome to the war."

Hello, Jaxterhammer, and welcome to Xenopedia! Thanks for your edit to the File:LDBanner.jpg page. We hope you'll stick around to make even more!

Have you created your profile page yet? It's your own personal page, and you can do anything you want with it! Your user page will also help us get to know you as an editor better.

Here are some links that you may find helpful:

  • Recent Wiki Activity and Recent changes provide you with a list of pages that other users are currently editing, which might give you an idea of where you can help out.
  • The help pages are a resource for you to use if you are new to wikis or need a guide for editing.
  • The Forum is a good place to ask any questions you may have, or start your own discussion.
  • Xenopedia's policies and guidelines are some rules for you to follow, and will also help you make better contributions.

Still have questions? Feel free to ask me or contact another administrator.

We hope you enjoy editing here, and look forward to seeing you around!

Leigh Burne (talk) (Contribs) 21:22, February 26, 2018 (UTC)

Hello Jaxter, I read your comment about the new Predator movie in the talk section of that article, I too think it looks terrible and far-fetched and I also responded to your comment with my analysis of the two movie trailers.Freighttrain, The (talk) (Contribs) 09:29, June 14, 2018 (UTC)

War Empress as a Progression from a Queen, not an Empress

Hello again Jaxterhammer, I am messaging you in regard to your moving of the War Empress section from the Queen article to the Empress article.

I haven't played Aliens versus Predator: Extinction but it would seem to me that the War Empress is a development of a Queen due to the immediate necessity of warfare whereby it will develop a thicker carapace whilst retaining the same overall size, instead of developing from an Empress which are larger, much rarer and speculated to be very old Queens.

My interpretation of the terminology used in the War Empresses name is that when the AVP:E video game was released, the Queen caste variant of Empress was not yet prevalent enough in the various franchise media to be commonly known amongst AVP fans etc. making 'War Empress' now seem like anachronistic terminology.

What is your perspective on this? Freighttrain, The (talk) (Contribs) 19:57, September 10, 2018 (UTC)

Lar'nix'va Page

Hi there.

I've just come across the Lar'nix'va page you created. You might well know this already, but the book Hunter's Planet is a bit of a tricky case because it's essentially one of two alternative sequels to the first AVP novel Prey (the other being War). The wiki as it stands isn't particularly clear on this — I've noticed some pages attempt to combine both novels into the same chronology — but, having now read both, I think it's fairly clear they're incongruous, alternate sequels and that War essentially retcons Hunter's Planet out of existence. That said, both these novels adapt the comic short story Aliens vs. Predator 2 (later collected as issue #0 of the War comic) as part of their narrative, and this would mean that Lar'nix'va and Shorty are in fact the same individual.

The short version — I've been working on tweaking Shorty's page to reflect this, and now that I've found your Lar'nix'va article, I'm planning on merging them, copying anything relevant from yours to the new, combined page and turning Lar'nix'va into a redirect. I hope that's OK, I just wanted to give you a heads-up before I did it in case you think your page has been scrapped.

As an aside, by the same token, I think there's an argument that Nat'ka'pu from Hunter's Planet and Top-Knot from War are one and the same, given that both are the leader of Lar'nix'va/Shorty's clan in their respective books. However, while Hunter's Planet specifically states Lar'nix'va and Shorty are the same individual, it doesn't do so for Nat'ka'pu/Top-Knot, so it's more open to interpretation. Do you have any thoughts on that?--Buck-ark LEIGH BURNE(Talk) 17:52, May 13, 2019 (UTC)

Hello Editor

I'm new, and wondering about the site.

as I don't know much about this site, I'm hoping you can enlighten me, or at least direct me to someone who can. I've noticed your Following Pages, and various other things regarding your activity, and I figured you'd know something about this place.

see, I'm very new to this whole site, and don't really have anything official to add. instead, I make blog posts, like the Agilomorph Prowler, or really anything going through my head regarding the Xenomorph. I have quite a few ideas, including a revised Ultramorph, a new type called the Agilomorph, and variants including the Demimorph and Titanimorph, not to mention the additions to the Neomorph. I've only recently started putting these down, and I was wondering if you knew anything of relevance about the lore of the Xenomorph. see, I read a page or two, and I understand you're deeply involved in what happens here. I was specifically thinking about bouncing ideas off of you, seeing as you seem knowledgable about the site, and probably are still active.

either way, I was hoping you knew whether or not the Agilimorph ideas wer even allowed. I really don't know if I'm allowed to post alternative ideas to the Xenomorph Parasite.

leaving alone all the other options I left out there, I just want to know if I could get help on the Agilimorph, and if it's even allowed to post things contradicting the main story ideas.

Thanks

hey, checking on that.

the only real comment I have is, who's Liegh? I looked it up, and didn't find anything. if you'd point them out, I'd be happy to look at it.

besides that, thanks for the info. I'll be sure to do so.

Trices (talk) (Contribs) 22:02, November 6, 2019 (UTC)

Ignore blocked user's requests

Hello Jaxter, please make sure you do not edit this wiki on Freight's behalf, he was banned for a good reason and I will not have him use others as a proxy to get around his ban. So do not under any circumstances agree to his requests or suggestion. If you need convincing on what kind person Freight is and the kind of behavior that got him banned, check this out. https://www.reddit.com/r/predator/comments/cnec5b/do_we_condone_this_behavior_here/ There is far more of this on that site. On here, he called the director of The Predator a "Rapist black man", now I am not too fussed on that movie but that does not excuse using such inappopriate behavior like that. ----PredTriLaser The Cruentus(Talk) 18:00, April 2, 2020 (UTC)

Dark

When I edited Dark's page, I was merely making a technical correction. If you look at all three campaigns, there were seven Predators on the planet, as they had abandoned it so long ago. As a result, Dark was the only Predator to escape the planet alive. And I certainly am not bothering people or articles by making minor adjustments. (Whatweare (talk) (Contribs) 17:29, May 3, 2020 (UTC))

Tone

Heya mate, i've been noticing the passive aggressive tone of your comments lately so this is just a friendly reminder to please keep things civil between yourself and other editors, regardless if you disagree with editing choices or not. HadAnd0426 (talk) (Contribs) 15:43, May 17, 2020 (UTC)

Jaxter, having seen your reply to HadAnd, I am now going to tell you to watch your tone. The rules of this wiki are clear, be civil towards one another. All edits get changed or reverted, and it is no excuse to be uncivil towards others. If you disagree with a change, you simply create a discussion in the talk page of the article in question or the editor's talk page so you can discuss it civily. So please refrain making such comments in future, there is a proper process to voice disagreement, I suggest you use it. --PredTriLaser The Cruentus(Talk) 12:04, May 19, 2020 (UTC)

Your user page or profile is your own personal space on Xenopedia and is yours to do with as you wish. As such, Xenopedia's usual Page and File policies do not apply. - Source

Also please ensure to respect the user's wishes — if he/she does not wish to have such content posted on their talk page, you must accept their decision. - Source

If you're going to use Xenopedia policy as a defense, please at least read it properly, Don't Delete Discussions. You are currently repeatedly breaking the rules and purposefully ignoring admins, if you care about this wiki then I suggest you start acting more maturely. Fandom is and always has been a place for community-built sites, which means that edits are pretty much guaranteed to be changed by someone else sometime down the line. The Xenopedia admins have come to the conclusion that the Drone and Warrior pages are best one and the same, now I don't agree at all, but I'm not about to start edit warring and cussing out the admins for their decision. I agree with you that by changing the description from "looks like a Warrior" to "looks like a Drone" they have created unnecessary confusion, but the way to go about change is to do it calmly and civilly on the Talk Pages. Doing all of this, you're only going to dig yourself deeper into a hole that you won't be able to climb out of. --The Creature Slayer (talk) (Contribs) 16:12, May 24, 2020 (UTC)
That's obviously relegated only to ARTICLE talk pages. My talk page isn't an article. Perhaps you should take your own advice.
Nobody "cursed out the admins". In fact, I'm pretty sure I indicated on the TP that I wasn't interested in having the warrior/drone discussion, since all the Admins will probably just defer to Leigh like always. *Shrug* My wishes for my talk page are to exclude Cruentus' comments. Me and Had were having an exchange, there was no reason for him to jump in.
So don't bring the discussion here. You're not even an admin, why are you even commenting on my page about it?

Jaxterhammer (talk) (Contribs) 17:36, May 24, 2020 (UTC)

"User talk pages are also important, being a place where users can communicate about a wide variety of things, as well as receiving warnings from other users regarding unhelpful edits, and messages from Administrators about blocks." Tell me again about how it obviously only refers to article talk pages. I'm not an admin, no, but I believe in orderly conduct and I have properly read all of the policies and guidelines as is good practice for someone who wishes to edit on a wiki. Of the two articles you provided as a "source", only one of them actually pertains to talk pages, the other was about user pages (which this is not). The one that you linked that does talk about talk pages specifically has this at the top of the page: "Remember that you should never delete discussions, even after they are concluded, as they are an important record of what has been said." I couldn't care even the slightest bit about your quarrels, I'm just trying to help you not get yourself blocked, as I assume that would be something that you wouldn't want. --The Creature Slayer (talk) (Contribs) 17:55, May 24, 2020 (UTC)

Warnings

Warnings from admins don't get removed Jaxter, you should know this . Also HadAnd is a content mod, that makes him staff on here. --PredTriLaser The Cruentus(Talk) 17:06, May 25, 2020 (UTC)

Show me the rule that outlines that. Also, I was talking to CreatureSlayer for butting in, not Had.
Also, while we're on the subject of admins, the page clearly says you cannot tell me what to do, especially on my own page. Since I'm fairly certain that's a rule you made up, I will be removing this comment as well.

"All users, regardless of status and position, are expected to follow these policies." You are not immune to the rules. I'm clearly indicating I don't want your comments on my page, but you keep re-adding them. I'm asking you to stop.Jaxterhammer (talk) (Contribs) 23:12, May 25, 2020 (UTC)


Jaxter, the rule regarding not removing warnings is almost universal amongst wikis, you should know that. As you keep on removing warnings despite being told not to, I am now going to give you an official warning. If you disregard or delete that, you will be blocked. Your reactions have been downright immature, disrespectful and rude. Since you seem to have read our policy, you might want to remember the one about being civil to other users and to take disagreements to talk pages instead of leaving rude comments in the summary box. Also while admins cannot and should not abuse their responsibilities by telling people what to do in general or using their position to get their own way, they can give warnings and can tell people how to behave within the context of the rules. I.e if someone is being uncivil, we do have the right to tell them to stop and behave, if someone is making fanon articles, we can tell them to stop and so on and so on. This isn't a free for all playground. There are rules, respect them.--PredTriLaser The Cruentus(Talk) 11:35, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

Block

For disregarding warnings, I'm blocking you for 3 months. Just know that this was entirely avoidable, all you had to do was respect the rules, respect the warnings and the advise of your fellow users. They were trying to help you. You have no one to blame but yourself and for what, pride? Contect central if you wish, they will likely tell you about removing warnings and people's comments. If you ever come back after your block is up, I hope you will learn to deal with others more civilly and use the talk pages when there is a disagreement. --PredTriLaser The Cruentus(Talk) 02:14, May 27, 2020 (UTC)

It was unavoidable, I agree. You just blantantly disregarded rules and made up your own to justify it. I'll be making a blog post explaining why I believe you and Leigh should be removed as Staff for the good of the wiki.Jaxterhammer (talk) (Contribs) 02:15, May 27, 2020 (UTC)
I did no such thing, giving out warnings and making sure they have not been removed has been a common practice for wikis for years. You on the other hand, have been blatently disregarding rules. Like others, you blame the admins instead of taking responsibilty for your actions. While I can understand your dislike of me giving the current circumstamces, your desire to remove Leigh from his position shows pettiness, He is not involved in these warnings. This is not the behavior of someone who thinks about the good of the wiki. Now for your continued disregarding of our policy and further removal of warnings, your block is going to be extended. Further removed will have your talk page privelleges removed. ----PredTriLaser The Cruentus(Talk) 02:23, May 27, 2020 (UTC)
I don't wanna throw fuel on the fire, especially as I'm not entirely clear on what exactly has happened to kick this all off, but a few things I would like to add:
1. Creature Slayer wasn't "butting in". Talk pages are open spaces where anyone can comment, Admin or otherwise, so long as their messages are civil and courteous. To me, Slayer's messages are both, and it seems quite clear that he was merely trying to help. Feel free to disagree with what he says (courteously), but he's perfectly within his rights to share his thoughts.
2. The rule regarding deleting talk messages applies to all talk pages. If our policy is unclear on this, perhaps it needs amending. You're correct in saying your user page is yours to do with as you wish (short of posting offensive content), but your user talk page is governed by the same rules as any other talk page on the wiki; it's not intended to be a user's personal space that they can curate as they see fit, but a message board just like any other talk page. Messages can be removed and archived, but should not be deleted.
3. Finally, as Cruentus pointed out, I've had precisely zero involvement in this quarrel until now and haven't even been on the wiki since it all kicked off, so I'm not sure why you think I need to be removed from the site as an Admin?--Buck-ark LEIGH BURNE(Talk) 08:29, May 27, 2020 (UTC)
It started when HadAnd saw Jaxter's responses and messaged him about his tone. When he replied with a rude response, I then warned about his tone. He then started removing the messages from his page. Creatureslayer tried to point out the actual policy when Jaxter was only using parts of it for his benefit and then he removed them too. 
Now Jaxter, I saw your comment about removing them again, both of us have now told you that they should not be deleted, you have continously ignored the warnings, which lead to your block, you then disregarded it again by removing the content again thus your block was extended. That is two strikes by the way. Doing it again will leave me no choice but to make your block permanent. Unless Leigh wants to weigh in on that. Freighttrain is a despicable person but not even he used up his three chances within such a short time. Please consider your behavior Jaxter, I really don't want to perma block you but if you continuing you behavior in ignoring our policy then I'll have to. Any disagreement you had with Leigh's edits should have been taken to the article's talk pages. Did you even do any of that? I hope that should you decide to come back that you will take the policy more seriously and discuss edits that you disagree with civily and on the proper talk page. ----PredTriLaser The Cruentus(Talk) 10:40, May 27, 2020 (UTC)

Removing Leigh and Cruentus

Greetings everyone who finds this page! In October (would've been earlier, but the resident Admin has ignored Policy Guidelines in favor or doing whatever he wants) I will begin the Process of Removing A Bad Bureaucrat as described by Community Central. I've already got my First Draft Post up if anyone is curious and wants to read it. Hopefully, through this process, Xenopedia can be restored to it's state 10 years ago; a much more active community where edits are respected and appreciated.

Thanks in advance! An offsite version will also be available for those who have had their privileges removed. Jaxterhammer (talk)

  • Community Discussion
  • Vote
  • Submit vote and discussion for removal process

Jaxterhammer (talk) (Contribs) 22:23, May 28, 2020 (UTC)

(Contribs) 07:13, May 28, 2020 (UTC)

Gallery

Things of Note

  • Users are told not to make unnecessary edits. Fellow admins have free reign to do this however, with no warnings. Leigh is the main offender. Violates the All Editors Are Equal policy.
  • After pointing out most of Cruentus' edits are not wiki-building driven, Cruentus suddenly begins being article-active. Note: Before the observation was made (May 27th~) the bulk of Cruentus' edits are Reversions, Warnings, Blocks, and user talk page edits. This trend continues as far back as January of this year (2020). Further still are page moves, blocks, deletions. Very little actual editing. Logs indicate this has been a 3 year trend.
  • Observation of Cruentus' blocking and discipline trends suggests he finds being disobeyed more objectionable than people vandalizing the Wiki.
  • Some users are blocked for sockpuppeting infinitely. At least one user admitted to socking but since they apologized, it's suddenly fine.
  • Many of the users Cruentus blocks are new, with fewer than 100 edits. In the event the block isn't permanent, many of the users don't bother returning.
  • Neither Leigh nor Cruentus have created a guideline in dealing with objectionable Admin behavior. Cruentus has actually warned me for raising a concern. Intentional or not, this creates a environment where users are discouraged from raising a concern because:
    • A) Concern will be met with punishment. See Here
    • B) Concern will be dismissed if users have had prior disagreements with Staff. See Here
  • Sudden Influx of new editors after my claim the community is stifled.

To-Do List

  • Peruse Leigh's previous edits for unnecessary reversions.
  • Peruse HadAnd's previous edits, punishments for conduct offsite.
  • Investigate Cruentus' editing trends more thoroughly.

Cruentus Comment

Hello Jaxter, now I wasn't going to message you about this since it is your right to make a complaint and discussion, so I wasn't going to get in your way but if you are going to do so, you might want avoid lying. I did not allow a user to evade permablock, I suspected him but did not have hard proof, so instead I watched him. I am not going to block someone just because I got a gut instinct.

Also that message about ignoring Freight's request was not a preemptive warning, I wasn't accusing or claiming you were helping, I was actually giving you a heads up about him and what his intentions were, I was trying to help you which clearly got misinterpreted as a warning. Seriously you are not the first person that Freight has tried to use as a meatpuppet.

I'm sorry you feel that your block was severe but you was not only being rude and uncivil, but you were removing discussions and warnings from your page. votes and discussions can't be done with people with bias Jaxter, so using people with grudges would be inappropriate.

Whatever happens you're welcome back when your block is over, but you need to stop taking edit reversions personally and you need to reply with more civility. You could have just said to HadAnd "Ok, I was a bit out of line but I am frustrated with Leigh reverting my edits" And you have admitted you were out of line. This situation was escalated by you. Leigh has told you his reasons for his reversions I believe and I told you that I reverted your edits on dorsal spines because it was speculation. The reason why the Runner has no dorsal spines was simply for aerodynamics, it has nothing to do with intelligence and power. You should not hold a grudge against users that revert your edits because it is going to happen on a wiki. --PredTriLaser The Cruentus(Talk) 23:13, May 28, 2020 (UTC)

We'll discuss this in October, when we're on more equal ground, on a blog post. I'm not interested in having a talk-page confined discussion. In the meantime, the Gallery descriptions are only shorthands of something more detailed (in which I will do all my best to include context by investigating each situation).

So please don't take them at face value. Jaxterhammer (talk) (Contribs) 23:18, May 28, 2020 (UTC)

I'm not taking them at face value Jaxter, but just look at how you are titleing them, its slander/libel and very misleading. I never allowed a blocked user to sockpuppet and I certainly did not preemptively warn you. --PredTriLaser The Cruentus(Talk) 23:26, May 28, 2020 (UTC)
If that's all true, you'll be able to easily prove it and successfully defend yourself in October. You have nothing to worry about.Jaxterhammer (talk) (Contribs) 00:29, May 29, 2020 (UTC)

Jaxter, as I have I previously said, if you are going to prepare for a discussion in October, do not lie, slander or mislead. I noticed that you recently put that I have only suddenly become active and you seem to think or more likely, you want others to think that its to do with you rather than a little fact called a new game known as Predator Hunting Grounds, I have only recently been listening to the audio logs. Therefor its only recently that I have had the necessary infomation to put on the wiki because yes, my editing is not as frequent as I would like and usually its because Leigh and the other good contributors here simply leave me with very little to contribute because they are effective and good editors, hence why I only edit these days when I gain access to new information. i.e Prototype, Phalanx and Predator Hunting grounds and I usually I just monitor the wiki until I have something to edit with. I am not worried and the members of this community are not stupid, we know the difference between the truth and these false accusations of yours, so that will be brought out into the light when it comes to the discussion, I am telling you this not to convince others but to help you not dig yourself deeper, because I am pretty sure lying, slander, manipulating information and using confirmation bias is only to going to get you in further trouble and I mean that globally because I doubt the staff of central would tolerate someone trying to rig things to their advantage and abuse the rights they have given you, because we will report it to staff if you continue lying or falsly accusing. So if you are going to use notes about me and Leigh, I suggest being truthful because you would be hurting your integrity by being underhanded, if you are so confident that you are right, you have no need to bend information to your favor do you? --PredTriLaser The Cruentus(Talk) 11:23, May 30, 2020 (UTC)

Please stop accusing me of deception. I'm a lot of things; a liar is not one of them and this is not an insult I'm going to tolerate. What you're reading are observations and interpretatios (most of which can be substantiated, feature caps, links, ect), not objective facts and it says as much.
Not to mention much of this is largely incomplete. Also, do not try to discourage me from building and pushing my case. The only way this blog isn't going ot be created in October is if I simply forgot to make it (entirely possible with everything going on!).Jaxterhammer (talk) (Contribs) 02:38, May 31, 2020 (UTC)

Since you are now involving me in your prosecution case, I kind of feel like I need to chime in and speak my mind. So Ive seen your things of note article and, first lets me clarify that, yes, I was definitely no saint, especially in the past. I have been banned on other wikis for my behavior, but I would like to think that those experiences have ultimately bettered me. Removing those warnings definitely wasn't right, but it was an impulsive move made half a DECADE ago and was practically, in the grand scheme of things, one of my earliest edits on the wiki. As for the 'idiot' scenario, I think it goes without saying that he was being just that, I wouldn't have called him an idiot if I were reverting a relatively unreasonable edit of his but he was just vandalizing the wiki, and if I recall, adding incredibly inappropriate images. Now those things you have mentioned by default definitely weren't okay, but I feel like my contemporary attitude has for the most part made up for my mistakes. So yes, I did and have acted entitled but can you really tell me that what your doing right now is better than that? This goes into whole new lengths of pettiness. All I did was politely ask you to try and be a bit more civil so we could all get along and you retaliate with this massive 'you vs the world' mentality and now you've essentially declared war, which frankly I can't see going anywhere that benefits you in the long run. Why would it be so difficult to just humble yourself a little.HadAnd0426 (talk) (Contribs) 12:56, June 4, 2020 (UTC)

The review isn't about you; I just happened to find instances of warning removal (with no reprimands) on your account when I looked. Xenopedia's policy dates back to 2014, iirc, so regardless of if it was years ago, this is blatant unequal treatment of users. I know Cruentus reads everything I add, so I know he's seen what I've found. No comments from him. No explanation as to why what you did was fine while what I did has me staring down a permaban hammer. If you care to notice, I didn't bother debating the issue with you further because I knew I wasn't going to change your mind, nor you mine. If Cruentus hadn't jumped into our exchange like he likes to do, we wouldn't be here now. If you're going to blame anyone for the Admin review, blame him. He likes to micromanage EVERY conflict and that in itself is inflammatory.

I'm not going to stand for Admins being given preferential treatment or subjecting users to undue Administrator presence. If I'm talking to Leigh or you or ANYONE, there is absolutely ZERO reason for Cruentus to chime in.Jaxterhammer (talk) (Contribs) 18:49, June 4, 2020 (UTC)

My Block

Per our discord conversation, is my block going to be lessened from 6 months or did I misinterpret something? @CruentusJaxterhammer (talk) (Contribs) 01:10, June 13, 2020 (UTC)

Not at all, you saw it. Just keep the policy in mind and talk to your fellow editors if you are confused about something. We are here to help each other. ----PredTriLaser The Cruentus(Talk) 10:00, June 13, 2020 (UTC)
Sounds good.Jaxterhammer (talk) (Contribs) 01:12, June 14, 2020 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.